PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIUS.L is traded in GBP, while EEDM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EEDM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIUS.L achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than EEDM.L's 18.62% return.


HIUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.38%
6M
22.13%
YTD
24.66%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
10Y*

EEDM.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.27%
6M
13.23%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
24.66%10.31%9.54%23.06%-19.02%
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
18.62%25.83%8.57%2.77%-0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HIUS.L and EEDM.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.53

The correlation between HIUS.L and EEDM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIUS.L
HIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EEDM.L
EEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIUS.LEEDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.04

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

8.60

-6.39

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIUS.L and EEDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIUS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.71%, roughly equal to the maximum EEDM.L drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIUS.L and EEDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIUS.LEEDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.71%

-27.49%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.71%

-11.08%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-15.81%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-10.27%

+3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-11.96%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.84%

3.92%

+13.92%

Volatility

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) is 7.56%, while iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that HIUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIUS.LEEDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

8.97%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

18.83%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.22%

20.75%

+24.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.51%

17.79%

+10.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.51%

19.28%

+9.23%

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIUS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIUS.L vs. EEDM.L - Dividend Comparison

HIUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.65%1.89%2.37%2.37%2.59%1.97%1.54%0.05%
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIUS.L and EEDM.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HIUS.L.

HIUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HIUS.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic ESG Universal Screened Select Index, while EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HIUS.L and 0.18% for EEDM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIUS.L and EEDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer