PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPO vs. PAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HIPO vs. PAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIPO achieves a -15.09% return, which is significantly lower than PAGS's -3.85% return.


HIPO

1D
0.27%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
-15.09%
6M
-17.80%
1Y
-13.60%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
10Y*

PAGS

1D
0.22%
1M
3.82%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-9.66%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
-2.35%
5Y*
-28.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIPO vs. PAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.
-15.09%12.36%193.53%-32.94%-80.78%-73.43%
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
-3.85%60.75%-49.80%42.68%-66.67%-54.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HIPO and PAGS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.29

The correlation between HIPO and PAGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIPO:

$673.09M

PAGS:

$2.53B

EPS

HIPO:

$4.30

PAGS:

R$7.31

PE Ratio

HIPO:

5.94

PAGS:

6.25

PS Ratio

HIPO:

1.39

PAGS:

0.67

PB Ratio

HIPO:

1.50

PAGS:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIPO:

$479.80M

PAGS:

R$19.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIPO:

$194.20M

PAGS:

R$10.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

HIPO:

$116.10M

PAGS:

R$9.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIPO vs. PAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPO
HIPO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGS
PAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPO vs. PAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIPOPAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.08

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

0.43

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

0.90

-1.59

HIPO vs. PAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the PAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIPO and PAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIPO vs. PAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPO drawdown since its inception was -97.41%, which is greater than PAGS's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPO and PAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPOPAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.41%

-90.00%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.35%

-27.21%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.73%

-57.60%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.41%

-84.37%

-6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.29%

-55.47%

-32.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.81%

13.03%

+6.78%

Volatility

HIPO vs. PAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) is 9.52%, while PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that HIPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIPOPAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

11.85%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.11%

33.74%

-10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.39%

49.06%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.00%

61.40%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.00%

61.08%

+10.92%

Dividends

HIPO vs. PAGS - Dividend Comparison

HIPO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.


PositionTTM2025
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
6.92%3.94%

Financials

HIPO vs. PAGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hippo Holdings Inc. and PagSeguro Digital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
121.50M
4.69B
(HIPO) Total Revenue
(PAGS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HIPO values in USD, PAGS values in BRL

HIPO vs. PAGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hippo Holdings Inc. and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
32.2%
51.2%
Portfolio components
HIPO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hippo Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 39.10M and revenue of 121.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

PAGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.40B and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

HIPO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hippo Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.20M and revenue of 121.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

PAGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

HIPO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hippo Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 7.10M and revenue of 121.50M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

PAGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a net income of 535.32M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIPO and PAGS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAGS has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to HIPO (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPO dropped -97.41% vs PAGS's -90.00%.

PAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIPO and PAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer