HIMZ vs. WEEK
HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIMZ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while WEEK is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -93.56% vs 3.81% for WEEK. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for WEEK.
Performance
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -58.85% return, which is significantly lower than WEEK's 1.44% return.
HIMZ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -58.85%
- 6M
- -69.67%
- 1Y
- -93.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEEK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | -58.85% | -65.21% |
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 1.44% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMZ and WEEK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMZ vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank
HIMZ
WEEK
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIMZ | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -19.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 4.65 | -3.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 29.49 | -30.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 263.82 | -265.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIMZ | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 9.29 | -9.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 10.05 | -10.45 |
Drawdowns
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and WEEK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMZ | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -0.13% | -98.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.04% | -0.13% | -97.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.53% | 0.00% | -95.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.90% | -0.01% | -68.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.15% | 0.01% | +79.14% |
Volatility
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 53.92% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.07%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMZ | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.92% | 0.07% | +53.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.06% | 0.25% | +130.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.74% | 0.41% | +191.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.34% | 0.39% | +199.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.34% | 0.39% | +199.95% |
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMZ vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison
HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than WEEK's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | 5.94% | 2.44% |
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 3.72% | 3.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMZ and WEEK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIMZ has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to WEEK (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs WEEK's -0.13%.
On 1-year performance, WEEK leads with 3.81% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WEEK has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -93.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.
HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 3.72% for WEEK.
HIMZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.19% for WEEK.
WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMZ and WEEK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer