PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMZ vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return.


HIMZ

1D
-3.64%
1M
78.12%
YTD
-44.56%
6M
-52.24%
1Y
-79.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXL

1D
-23.06%
1M
21.44%
YTD
450.61%
6M
429.57%
1Y
976.09%
3Y*
120.84%
5Y*
42.16%
10Y*
64.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and SOXL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

0.37

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIMZ
SOXL

Consumer Defensive

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

HIMZ
100.0%
SOXL

-

Basic Materials

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Communication Services

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Energy

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Financial Services

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Healthcare

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Industrials

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Real Estate

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Technology

HIMZ

-

SOXL
100.0%

Utilities

HIMZ

-

SOXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMZSOXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.58

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

22.69

-23.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

72.83

-73.89

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 8.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMZ and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMZSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.18%

-90.46%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.18%

-43.47%

-53.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.98%

-23.06%

-70.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-34.95%

-34.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.50%

13.52%

+60.98%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) is 46.42%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that HIMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMZSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.42%

68.39%

-21.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

136.27%

99.84%

+36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

195.06%

116.79%

+78.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.31%

110.35%

+89.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.31%

100.62%

+99.69%

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMZ vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HIMZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
4.41%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMZ and SOXL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to HIMZ (46.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 976.09% vs -79.25% for HIMZ. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HIMZ has been the lower-risk option at 46.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 976.09% return vs -79.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMZ and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer