HIMZ vs. ORLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HIMZ is actively managed, while ORLG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ORLG.

Performance

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HIMZ

• 1D: -18.56%
• 1M: 7.30%
• 6M: -39.29%
• YTD: -44.84%
• 1Y: -85.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ORLG

• 1D: 8.37%
• 1M: -11.93%
• 6M: -23.86%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-39.63%
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF	-25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and ORLG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	-0.11

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. ORLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ORLG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIMZ	ORLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	—	—

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than ORLG's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and ORLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	ORLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-39.93%	-58.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.01%	-34.91%	-59.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.90%	-20.65%	-50.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	ORLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	138.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	181.99%	59.08%	+122.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	197.69%	59.08%	+138.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	197.69%	59.08%	+138.61%

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ORLG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. ORLG - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, while ORLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	4.43%	2.44%
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMZ and ORLG in my portfolio?

HIMZ and ORLG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIMZ or ORLG?

On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMZ or ORLG?

ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMZ or ORLG?

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for ORLG.

What is the main difference between HIMZ and ORLG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.75% for ORLG.