HIMZ vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than CMGG's -37.52% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: 78.12%
• YTD: -44.56%
• 6M: -52.24%
• 1Y: -79.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -37.52%
• 6M: -40.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-44.56%	-28.62%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-37.52%	36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and CMGG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CMGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIMZ	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	—	—

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-56.75%	-41.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.98%	-48.19%	-45.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.79%	-23.37%	-46.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	136.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	195.06%	68.93%	+126.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.31%	68.93%	+131.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.31%	68.93%	+131.38%

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, while CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	4.41%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMZ and CMGG in my portfolio?

HIMZ and CMGG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIMZ or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMZ or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMZ or CMGG?

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.

What is the main difference between HIMZ and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.75% for CMGG.