HILDX vs. SAHMX
HILDX (Hartford International Value Fund Class F) and SAHMX (SA International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HILDX returned 15.68%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for SAHMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HILDX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for SAHMX.
Performance
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HILDX having a 13.67% return and SAHMX slightly lower at 13.44%.
HILDX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 30.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SAHMX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 33.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HILDX Hartford International Value Fund Class F | 13.67% | 44.87% | 3.71% | 19.94% | -2.20% | 18.87% | -5.88% | 18.29% | -17.64% | 19.47% |
SAHMX SA International Value Fund | 13.44% | 44.08% | 5.44% | 16.49% | -3.70% | 17.59% | -2.48% | 14.61% | -17.95% | 21.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HILDX and SAHMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between HILDX and SAHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HILDX vs. SAHMX — Risk / Return Rank
HILDX
SAHMX
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford International Value Fund Class F (HILDX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HILDX | SAHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.54 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 4.22 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 13.95 | -3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HILDX drawdown since its inception was -48.23%, smaller than the maximum SAHMX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HILDX and SAHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HILDX | SAHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.23% | -66.58% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -8.72% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -14.85% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.51% | -25.10% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.50% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -16.11% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.55% | +0.39% |
Volatility
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford International Value Fund Class F (HILDX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to SA International Value Fund (SAHMX) at 3.39%. This indicates that HILDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HILDX | SAHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.39% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 9.76% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 12.34% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 15.47% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 16.06% | +1.00% |
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HILDX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than SAHMX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HILDX vs. SAHMX - Dividend Comparison
HILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than SAHMX's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HILDX Hartford International Value Fund Class F | 5.32% | 6.05% | 3.54% | 2.80% | 2.98% | 3.35% | 2.20% | 3.19% | 8.50% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAHMX SA International Value Fund | 4.72% | 5.35% | 3.57% | 3.46% | 4.06% | 3.05% | 2.09% | 3.66% | 1.93% | 2.46% | 2.89% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HILDX and SAHMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HILDX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to SAHMX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HILDX dropped -48.23% vs SAHMX's -66.58%.
SAHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HILDX and SAHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer