PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than EMNE.DE's 9.92% return.


HIGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.65%

EMNE.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.09%
6M
8.22%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
1.29%4.89%5.70%11.59%-9.32%2.82%1.10%5.47%
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
9.92%22.18%9.86%18.79%-12.35%22.75%1.44%16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH.L and EMNE.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.57

The correlation between HIGH.L and EMNE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH.L
HIGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EMNE.DE
EMNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIGH.LEMNE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.72

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

6.34

-1.99

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH.L and EMNE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum EMNE.DE drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH.L and EMNE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGH.LEMNE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-34.37%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-10.90%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.65%

-15.10%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-24.70%

+10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.73%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-5.19%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.96%

-2.25%

Volatility

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) is 0.73%, while iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that HIGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMNE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGH.LEMNE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

3.80%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

12.63%

-9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

14.93%

-11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.47%

16.24%

-10.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.16%

19.98%

-12.82%

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNE.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH.L vs. EMNE.DE - Dividend Comparison

HIGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMNE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.39%2.61%2.95%3.17%3.34%2.40%1.85%2.67%
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH.L and EMNE.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.L.

HIGH.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while EMNE.DE is Europe Equities. HIGH.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while EMNE.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIGH.L and 0.12% for EMNE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH.L and EMNE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer