PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (HIDD.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIDD.L is traded in USD, while HWWA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HWWA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDD.L achieves a -36.42% return, which is significantly lower than HWWA.L's 13.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HIDD.L has underperformed HWWA.L with an annualized return of -4.40%, while HWWA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


HIDD.L

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.14%
6M
-36.79%
YTD
-36.42%
1Y
-35.17%
3Y*
-19.87%
5Y*
-7.25%
10Y*
-4.40%

HWWA.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.22%
6M
11.76%
YTD
13.44%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIDD.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF
-36.42%-1.93%-13.92%5.16%3.01%1.09%-7.68%7.53%-8.55%23.71%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
13.44%25.55%15.84%21.86%-17.71%20.63%14.38%23.34%-10.88%23.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDD.L and HWWA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2014

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between HIDD.L and HWWA.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDD.L
HIDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
HIDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (HIDD.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIDD.LHWWA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.41

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

3.17

-3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.71

13.02

-14.73

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDD.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDD.L and HWWA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDD.L drawdown since its inception was -57.94%, which is greater than HWWA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDD.L and HWWA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDD.LHWWA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.94%

-33.33%

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.39%

-8.86%

-39.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.94%

-15.57%

-42.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.94%

-26.70%

-31.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.94%

-33.33%

-24.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.85%

-0.64%

-50.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-5.33%

-12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.75%

2.16%

+18.59%

Volatility

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (HIDD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that HIDD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDD.LHWWA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

3.76%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.43%

10.21%

+15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.76%

12.30%

+16.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.26%

15.02%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

15.52%

+9.35%

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDD.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison

HIDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than HWWA.L's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIDD.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF
5.94%4.73%3.52%3.47%2.08%1.30%1.63%1.54%2.69%1.10%1.19%1.67%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.31%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDD.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDD.L.

HIDD.L tracks HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIDD.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDD.L and HWWA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer