HIBS vs. FLYD
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD).
HIBS and FLYD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIBS is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® High Beta Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2019. FLYD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. Both HIBS and FLYD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HIBS vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIBS vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -8.44% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -62.94% | -40.92% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 26.36% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -75.14% | -46.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's 26.36% return.
HIBS
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- 1Y
- -80.81%
- 3Y*
- -52.78%
- 5Y*
- -48.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FLYD
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- -62.53%
- 3Y*
- -52.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HIBS vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
FLYD
HIBS vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | -0.67 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | -0.73 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.90 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.76 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -0.86 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.67 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | -0.72 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and FLYD is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HIBS vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 5.17% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -97.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and FLYD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -97.96% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.93% | -82.41% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -97.09% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.95% | -82.46% | -10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.08% | 72.53% | +5.55% |
Volatility
HIBS vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) have volatilities of 27.85% and 28.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.85% | 28.29% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.19% | 54.96% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.43% | 92.87% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.11% | 83.48% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.36% | 83.48% | +11.88% |