HIBS vs. FLYD
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - HIBS tracks the S&P 500® High Beta Index while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIBS returned -63.69%/yr vs -56.28%/yr for FLYD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYD.
Performance
HIBS vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -64.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -30.35% return.
HIBS
- 1D
- -6.71%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- -64.03%
- 6M
- -61.26%
- 1Y
- -81.64%
- 3Y*
- -63.69%
- 5Y*
- -54.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLYD
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -24.33%
- YTD
- -30.35%
- 6M
- -26.65%
- 1Y
- -55.29%
- 3Y*
- -56.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -64.03% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -62.94% | -40.42% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -30.35% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -75.14% | -46.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and FLYD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between HIBS and FLYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
FLYD
HIBS vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 0.90 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -1.01 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | -2.07 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and FLYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -98.45% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.45% | -55.15% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.91% | -94.61% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -98.39% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.14% | -83.26% | -9.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.79% | 30.03% | +20.76% |
Volatility
HIBS vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a higher volatility of 34.88% compared to MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) at 26.01%. This indicates that HIBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.88% | 26.01% | +8.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.84% | 62.95% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.23% | 75.71% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.58% | 83.83% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.26% | 83.83% | +11.43% |
HIBS vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 9.87% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and FLYD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBS has higher volatility (34.88%) compared to FLYD (26.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs FLYD's -98.45%.
On 3-year performance, FLYD leads with -56.28% vs -63.69% for HIBS. On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FLYD has been the lower-risk option at 26.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLYD has performed better with a -56.28% return vs -63.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 9.87%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.
HIBS tracks S&P 500® High Beta Index, while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 0.95% for FLYD.
FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and FLYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer