HIABX vs. LCTIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIABX (Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund) and LCTIX (Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, HIABX returned 1.29%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for LCTIX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIABX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for LCTIX.

Performance

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) and Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares (LCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIABX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than LCTIX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HIABX has underperformed LCTIX with an annualized return of 1.29%, while LCTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.28% annualized return.

HIABX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: 1.29%

LCTIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.32%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 5.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIABX Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund	0.42%	7.29%	2.34%	6.97%	-14.21%	-0.94%	4.95%	10.66%	-4.70%	5.16%
LCTIX Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares	2.03%	5.12%	6.49%	8.47%	2.64%	2.41%	12.94%	1.55%	6.64%	4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HIABX and LCTIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010	0.12

Over the past year, HIABX and LCTIX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

HIABX vs. LCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIABX

HIABX Risk / Return Rank: 28
HIABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
HIABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
HIABX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HIABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
HIABX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

LCTIX

LCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
LCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) and Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares (LCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIABX	LCTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.72	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	6.05	-3.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.05	-0.78
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	4.56	-2.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	19.47	-12.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the LCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIABX and LCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIABX	LCTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.72	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	2.39	-2.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.84	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.77	-0.74

Drawdowns

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIABX drawdown since its inception was -91.15%, which is greater than LCTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIABX and LCTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIABX	LCTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.15%	-24.76%	-66.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-1.17%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.53%	-1.29%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.40%	-3.70%	-15.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.48%	-23.61%	+2.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	0.00%	-2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.49%	-3.85%	-20.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.27%	+0.63%

Volatility

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares (LCTIX) at 0.62%. This indicates that HIABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIABX	LCTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	0.62%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	1.45%	+1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	1.97%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.90%	2.44%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.32%	6.31%	-0.99%

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIABX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTIX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIABX vs. LCTIX - Dividend Comparison

HIABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than LCTIX's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HIABX Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund	5.56%	5.59%	3.71%	3.42%	4.63%	5.14%	0.23%	3.96%	0.37%	3.00%	0.40%
LCTIX Leader Capital High Quality Income Fund Institutional Shares	5.64%	5.90%	5.91%	5.50%	2.31%	1.93%	1.73%	2.92%	3.67%	2.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIABX and LCTIX in my portfolio?

HIABX and LCTIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIABX or LCTIX?

HIABX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to LCTIX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIABX dropped -91.15% vs LCTIX's -24.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.