PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.


HHIS.TO

1D
-1.25%
1M
7.52%
YTD
9.32%
6M
4.61%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
9.32%24.40%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HHIS.TO and VFV.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

0.79

The correlation between HHIS.TO and VFV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HHIS.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.44

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

13.10

-9.82

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHIS.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHIS.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.59

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.14

-0.40

Drawdowns

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIS.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-27.43%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-8.62%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-0.18%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-3.35%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.79%

2.26%

+7.53%

Volatility

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that HHIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIS.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

3.05%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

8.55%

+8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.36%

11.46%

+11.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.78%

14.91%

+18.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

16.57%

+17.21%

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HHIS.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.63%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
26.63%22.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHIS.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFV.TO.

HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer