HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HHIS.TO returned 9.36% vs 23.66% for QQCI.TO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCI.TO.

Performance

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQCI.TO's 12.05% return.

HHIS.TO

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.50%

QQCI.TO

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -2.73%
• 6M: 10.61%
• YTD: 12.05%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF	CA$10.82M	CA$10.09M	CA$9.97M
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	CA$110.99K	CA$82.96K	CA$149.10K

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF	2.42%	24.70%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	12.05%	12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.73

The correlation between HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIS.TO

HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 20
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HHIS.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.62	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	2.23	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.29	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	3.12	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	9.99	-9.06

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HHIS.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.83%	-18.95%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.43%	-7.62%	-16.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.08%	-5.79%	-3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-3.03%	-5.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.08%	2.37%	+7.71%

Volatility

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 5.36%. This indicates that HHIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HHIS.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	5.36%	+2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	11.34%	+7.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.01%	14.66%	+10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.39%	15.86%	+17.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.39%	15.86%	+17.53%

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HHIS.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.30%, more than QQCI.TO's 9.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF	29.30%	22.88%	0.00%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	9.13%	9.34%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO in my portfolio?

HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HHIS.TO or QQCI.TO?

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HHIS.TO or QQCI.TO?

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for QQCI.TO.

What is the main difference between HHIS.TO and QQCI.TO?

HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.