PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than LLHE.TO's 9.58% return.


HHIS.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
4.23%
6M
3.47%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LLHE.TO

1D
-1.68%
1M
14.22%
YTD
9.58%
6M
15.92%
1Y
45.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HHIS.TO and LLHE.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LLHE.TO
LLHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHIS.TOLLHE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.88

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

4.82

-2.14

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHIS.TO and LLHE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum LLHE.TO drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and LLHE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIS.TOLLHE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-37.80%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-25.14%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-1.68%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-13.49%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

9.78%

+0.08%

Volatility

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) have volatilities of 8.04% and 8.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIS.TOLLHE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

8.25%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.09%

29.06%

-10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

40.10%

-16.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.81%

41.56%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.81%

41.56%

-7.75%

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LLHE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHIS.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.93%, more than LLHE.TO's 20.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HHIS.TO and LLHE.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LLHE.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.40% for LLHE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and LLHE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer