HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HHIS.TO returned 31.98% vs 31.41% for JEPQ.TO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 9.32% | 24.40% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.09% | 10.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHIS.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between HHIS.TO and JEPQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHIS.TO
JEPQ.TO
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHIS.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 4.08 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 16.30 | -13.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHIS.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.51 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.34 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHIS.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -20.05% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.43% | -7.74% | -16.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -0.40% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -3.36% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 1.93% | +7.86% |
Volatility
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that HHIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHIS.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 4.05% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 9.88% | +7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.36% | 12.58% | +10.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 17.35% | +16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 17.35% | +16.43% |
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHIS.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.63%, more than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 26.63% | 22.88% | 0.00% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHIS.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer