HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO
HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HHIS.TO returned 27.04% vs 2.23% for CASH.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.91% return.
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 4.23% | 24.70% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHIS.TO and CASH.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHIS.TO
CASH.TO
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HHIS.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 7.03 | -5.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 113.10 | -112.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 389.01 | -386.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHIS.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -0.80% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.43% | -0.02% | -24.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | 0.00% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -0.00% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.86% | 0.01% | +9.85% |
Volatility
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that HHIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHIS.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 0.08% | +7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.09% | 0.16% | +17.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 0.24% | +23.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.81% | 0.61% | +33.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.81% | 0.61% | +33.20% |
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HHIS.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.93%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 27.93% | 22.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHIS.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for CASH.TO.
HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer