HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO
HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and BKCL.TO (Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while BKCL.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HHIS.TO returned 31.98% vs 53.29% for BKCL.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for BKCL.TO.
Performance
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than BKCL.TO's 17.43% return.
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 53.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 9.32% | 24.40% |
BKCL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF | 17.43% | 33.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHIS.TO and BKCL.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHIS.TO
BKCL.TO
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHIS.TO | BKCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.82 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 5.85 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 26.81 | -23.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHIS.TO | BKCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 4.25 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 2.06 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than BKCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and BKCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHIS.TO | BKCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -16.58% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.43% | -9.15% | -15.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -1.81% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -2.67% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 1.99% | +7.80% |
Volatility
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO) at 4.39%. This indicates that HHIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHIS.TO | BKCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 4.39% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 11.34% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.36% | 12.59% | +10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 13.17% | +20.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 13.17% | +20.61% |
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCL.TO's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHIS.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.63%, more than BKCL.TO's 11.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF | 11.48% | 12.60% | 15.02% | 7.91% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 26.63% | 22.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHIS.TO and BKCL.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.68% for BKCL.TO.
HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BKCL.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 1.68% for BKCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and BKCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer