HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO
HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BIGY.TO.
Performance
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than BIGY.TO's -3.71% return.
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 9.32% | 1.85% |
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -3.71% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHIS.TO and BIGY.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHIS.TO
BIGY.TO
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHIS.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHIS.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.15 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than BIGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and BIGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHIS.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -27.82% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -13.63% | +10.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -11.30% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | — | — |
Volatility
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHIS.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.36% | 28.63% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 28.63% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 28.63% | +5.15% |
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHIS.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.63%, less than BIGY.TO's 28.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 28.15% | 9.53% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 26.63% | 22.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HHIS.TO and BIGY.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BIGY.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and BIGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer