HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO
HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. HHIC.TO is actively managed, while ZCN.TO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HHIC.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.
Performance
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHIC.TO achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 12.24% return.
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 13.14% | 16.60% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 12.24% | 14.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHIC.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.86 |
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Financial Services
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Basic Materials
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Technology
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Communication Services
HHIC.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Healthcare
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Industrials
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Real Estate
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Utilities
HHIC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHIC.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZCN.TO
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HHIC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.30%, smaller than the maximum ZCN.TO drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIC.TO and ZCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHIC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.30% | -37.18% | +29.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | 0.00% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -4.73% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHIC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 13.09% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13.18% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.01% | +1.90% |
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHIC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHIC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than ZCN.TO's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 10.95% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.00% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHIC.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HHIC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HHIC.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHIC.TO and ZCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer