PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIC.TO achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 38.53% return.


HHIC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.03%
6M
13.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XEG.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
38.53%
6M
37.54%
1Y
51.12%
3Y*
26.37%
5Y*
28.03%
10Y*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HHIC.TO and XEG.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.13

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HHIC.TO
XEG.TO

Energy

34.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

32.7%

-

Basic Materials

11.3%

-

Technology

11.0%

-

Communication Services

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

HHIC.TO
34.8%
XEG.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

HHIC.TO
32.7%
XEG.TO

-

Basic Materials

HHIC.TO
11.3%
XEG.TO

-

Technology

HHIC.TO
11.0%
XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

HHIC.TO
10.2%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Healthcare

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Industrials

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Real Estate

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Utilities

HHIC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIC.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHIC.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.30%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIC.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIC.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-87.51%

+80.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-7.87%

+5.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-34.55%

+33.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

Volatility

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIC.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

23.30%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

28.72%

-11.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

33.40%

-16.47%

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHIC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than XEG.TO's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF
11.06%4.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.76%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHIC.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

HHIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HHIC.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIC.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer