PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHDVX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHDVX achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, HHDVX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


HHDVX

1D
1.06%
1M
1.90%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.21%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
11.41%

FGINX

1D
0.92%
1M
7.14%
YTD
17.90%
6M
22.44%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HHDVX
Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund
8.96%7.83%23.92%13.34%-4.85%30.88%4.39%21.84%-7.91%13.55%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
17.90%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HHDVX and FGINX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.90

The correlation between HHDVX and FGINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHDVX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHDVX
HHDVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HHDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HHDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HHDVXFGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.72

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

6.20

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

23.67

-17.08

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHDVX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHDVXFGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

4.01

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.10

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.79

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.55

+0.17

Drawdowns

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHDVX drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHDVX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHDVXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-54.80%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-7.34%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-13.28%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-16.21%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-37.37%

+1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

0.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-9.70%

+6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.91%

+0.37%

Volatility

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 2.79%. This indicates that HHDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHDVXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.79%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

8.23%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

11.36%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

14.88%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.04%

-0.51%

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHDVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHDVX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

HHDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FGINX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.64%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%
HHDVX
Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund
3.93%4.28%9.40%1.84%2.88%4.11%2.99%2.52%8.93%1.76%2.36%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHDVX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HHDVX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FGINX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHDVX dropped -36.13% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHDVX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer