PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHDVX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, HHDVX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


HHDVX

1D
1.06%
1M
1.90%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.21%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
11.41%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HHDVX
Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund
8.96%7.83%23.92%13.34%-4.85%30.88%4.39%21.84%-7.91%13.55%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HHDVX and FALIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between HHDVX and FALIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHDVX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHDVX
HHDVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HHDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HHDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HHDVXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.81

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.54

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.89

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.59

4.92

+1.66

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHDVX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHDVXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.81

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.78

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.77

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Drawdowns

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHDVX drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHDVX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHDVXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-62.37%

+26.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-5.03%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-18.89%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-21.48%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-37.51%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-4.17%

+3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-13.28%

+9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.78%

-0.50%

Volatility

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund (HHDVX) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HHDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHDVXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

0.00%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

4.20%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

8.06%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

16.44%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

18.58%

-2.05%

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHDVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHDVX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

HHDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
HHDVX
Hamlin High Dividend Equity Fund
3.93%4.28%9.40%1.84%2.88%4.11%2.99%2.52%8.93%1.76%2.36%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHDVX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HHDVX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHDVX dropped -36.13% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

FALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHDVX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer