HGIFX vs. TRULX
HGIFX (Hartford Core Equity Fund Class F) and TRULX (T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HGIFX returned 10.81%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for TRULX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HGIFX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for TRULX.
Performance
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGIFX achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than TRULX's 6.38% return.
HGIFX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
TRULX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGIFX Hartford Core Equity Fund Class F | 5.45% | 14.77% | 25.04% | 21.58% | -18.62% | 24.62% | 18.51% | 36.34% | -1.61% | 14.96% |
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core | 6.38% | 12.80% | 22.97% | 22.61% | -15.14% | 25.57% | 15.57% | 29.51% | -3.38% | 11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGIFX and TRULX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017 | 0.97 |
The correlation between HGIFX and TRULX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGIFX vs. TRULX — Risk / Return Rank
HGIFX
TRULX
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Equity Fund Class F (HGIFX) and T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HGIFX | TRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.02 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 8.93 | +0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGIFX drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, roughly equal to the maximum TRULX drawdown of -33.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGIFX and TRULX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGIFX | TRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -33.68% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.57% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.23% | -17.23% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -22.91% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -2.51% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -3.64% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.94% | -0.02% |
Volatility
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Core Equity Fund Class F (HGIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) at 3.82%. This indicates that HGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRULX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGIFX | TRULX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.82% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 8.97% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 11.39% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 16.02% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 16.98% | +0.91% |
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGIFX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than TRULX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
HGIFX vs. TRULX - Dividend Comparison
HGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, more than TRULX's 7.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGIFX Hartford Core Equity Fund Class F | 11.33% | 11.95% | 8.39% | 3.11% | 4.18% | 3.30% | 0.82% | 4.48% | 5.72% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core | 7.31% | 7.77% | 6.66% | 0.45% | 4.27% | 7.28% | 0.85% | 3.55% | 7.89% | 2.10% | 0.94% | 5.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HGIFX and TRULX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HGIFX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to TRULX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGIFX dropped -33.46% vs TRULX's -33.68%.
HGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HGIFX and TRULX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer