PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO).

HGGG.TO and KILO-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HGGG.TO is a passively managed fund by Harvest that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Gold Giants Index TR. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018.

Performance

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HGGG.TO
Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF		11.92%170.60%26.04%4.17%-4.68%-14.34%31.47%25.92%
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		11.54%56.51%37.76%10.43%6.38%-4.67%21.17%14.92%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HGGG.TO having a 11.92% return and KILO-B.TO slightly lower at 11.54%.

HGGG.TO

1D
5.28%
1M
-16.08%
YTD
11.92%
6M
29.96%
1Y
130.52%
3Y*
52.68%
5Y*
31.56%
10Y*
—

KILO-B.TO

1D
1.45%
1M
-9.47%
YTD
11.54%
6M
22.50%
1Y
47.79%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
24.84%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Often compared with HGGG.TO:
HGGG.TO vs. AMAX.TOHGGG.TO vs. HGY.TOHGGG.TO vs. ZGLH.TOHGGG.TO vs. CGXF.TOHGGG.TO vs. ZGD.TOHGGG.TO vs. HUG.TOHGGG.TO vs. CGL.TO
Often compared with KILO-B.TO:
KILO-B.TO vs. ZGLD.TOKILO-B.TO vs. ZGLH.TOKILO-B.TO vs. VALT.TOKILO-B.TO vs. BTCY.TOKILO-B.TO vs. ZGD.TOKILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TOKILO-B.TO vs. CGL-C.TO

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGGG.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

HGGG.TO
Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HGGG.TO
HGGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
HGGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO
KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HGGG.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

1.85

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.31

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.69

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.30

9.43

+5.87

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGGG.TO and KILO-B.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HGGG.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.85

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.50

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.31

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between HGGG.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HGGG.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HGGG.TO
Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.54%2.65%0.54%
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%0.00%

Drawdowns

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGGG.TO and KILO-B.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HGGG.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.54%

-22.54%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.16%

-17.41%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.14%

-17.41%

-21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.08%

-9.47%

-6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-7.59%

-12.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

4.96%

+3.46%

Volatility

HGGG.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.75% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 10.32%. This indicates that HGGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HGGG.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

10.32%

+8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.23%

23.01%

+13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.82%

26.03%

+17.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.99%

16.61%

+15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.39%

17.98%

+14.41%