PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

HGEN.AX (Global X Hydrogen ETF) and IHWL.AX (iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HGEN.AX tracks the Global X Hydrogen Index while IHWL.AX tracks the iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGEN.AX returned 9.56%/yr vs 17.75%/yr for IHWL.AX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Global X Hydrogen ETF (HGEN.AX) and iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGEN.AX achieves a 34.18% return, which is significantly higher than IHWL.AX's 8.01% return.

HGEN.AX

1D
-6.71%
1M
-22.55%
6M
6.70%
YTD
34.18%
1Y
81.42%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IHWL.AX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.53%
6M
6.33%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HGEN.AX
Global X Hydrogen ETF		34.18%43.64%-10.40%-20.10%-36.18%7.90%
IHWL.AX
iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF		8.01%17.85%20.95%26.93%-21.57%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.54

The correlation between HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Hydrogen ETF

iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF

Often compared with HGEN.AX:
HGEN.AX vs. CORE.AXHGEN.AX vs. ESGI.AXHGEN.AX vs. ESTX.AXHGEN.AX vs. F100.AXHGEN.AX vs. GLIN.AXHGEN.AX vs. HJPN.AXHGEN.AX vs. IAA.AX
Often compared with IHWL.AX:
IHWL.AX vs. AUMF.AXIHWL.AX vs. ISEC.AXIHWL.AX vs. BILL.AXIHWL.AX vs. F100.AXIHWL.AX vs. HJPN.AXIHWL.AX vs. OOO.AXIHWL.AX vs. VDCO.AX

Return for Risk

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HGEN.AX
HGEN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HGEN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGEN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGEN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HGEN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGEN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX
IHWL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IHWL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HGEN.AX) and iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HGEN.AXIHWL.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.67
1.38

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.24
1.98

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.89

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

7.98

+0.27

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGEN.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IHWL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGEN.AX drawdown since its inception was -72.54%, which is greater than IHWL.AX's maximum drawdown of -39.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HGEN.AXIHWL.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.54%

-39.03%

-33.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.11%

-10.16%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.84%

-19.96%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-27.41%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.03%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.24%

-1.30%

-28.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.61%

-5.15%

-42.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.68%

2.44%

+7.24%

Volatility

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HGEN.AX) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX) at 2.78%. This indicates that HGEN.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHWL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HGEN.AXIHWL.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.51%

2.78%

+11.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.68%

11.53%

+22.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.24%

13.91%

+33.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.75%

17.51%

+19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.75%

17.30%

+19.45%

Dividends

HGEN.AX vs. IHWL.AX - Dividend Comparison

HGEN.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than IHWL.AX's 5.28% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGEN.AX
Global X Hydrogen ETF		0.83%0.34%0.60%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHWL.AX
iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.28%0.98%1.11%3.06%0.77%11.16%0.00%0.00%2.35%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGEN.AX tracks Global X Hydrogen Index, while IHWL.AX tracks iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGEN.AX and IHWL.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer