PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HFR.TO (Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF) and HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFR.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Global X, while HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. HFR.TO is actively managed, while HXT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HFR.TO returned 3.28%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for HXT.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFR.TO charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for HXT.TO.

Performance

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF (HFR.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFR.TO achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than HXT.TO's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HFR.TO has underperformed HXT.TO with an annualized return of 3.28%, while HXT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.

HFR.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.44%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
3.28%

HXT.TO

1D
-0.87%
1M
3.51%
YTD
10.03%
6M
12.04%
1Y
31.51%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFR.TO
Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF		1.32%4.04%6.89%7.86%-0.77%0.70%3.51%4.41%0.83%2.34%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF		10.03%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HFR.TO and HXT.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

0.04

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HFR.TO
HXT.TO

Real Estate

0.7%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

12.6%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Energy

-

15.9%

Financial Services

-

37.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

8.9%

Technology

-

12.0%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Real Estate

HFR.TO
0.7%
HXT.TO
0.5%

Basic Materials

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
12.6%

Communication Services

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
3.6%

Energy

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
15.9%

Financial Services

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
37.3%

Healthcare

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO

-

Industrials

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
8.9%

Technology

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
12.0%

Utilities

HFR.TO

-

HXT.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF

Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HFR.TO:
HFR.TO vs. MNU-U.TOHFR.TO vs. VVSG.TOHFR.TO vs. HBNK.TOHFR.TO vs. HSAV.TOHFR.TO vs. QQCL.TOHFR.TO vs. CBIL.TOHFR.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Often compared with HXT.TO:
HXT.TO vs. VCN.TOHXT.TO vs. XIU.TOHXT.TO vs. XIC.TOHXT.TO vs. XEQT.TOHXT.TO vs. VFV.TOHXT.TO vs. HXCN.TOHXT.TO vs. HXH.TO

Return for Risk

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HFR.TO
HFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
HFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF (HFR.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HFR.TOHXT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.15
2.70

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.15
3.63

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.49

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.43

4.11

+5.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.37

19.10

+18.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFR.TO and HXT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HFR.TOHXT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

2.70

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.21

1.14

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.84

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.70

-0.09

Drawdowns

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.56%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFR.TO and HXT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HFR.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.56%

-35.48%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-7.71%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.52%

-12.36%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.52%

-16.33%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.56%

-35.48%

+12.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.87%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-4.66%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

1.65%

-1.55%

Volatility

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF (HFR.TO) is 0.28%, while Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that HFR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HFR.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

3.25%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.81%

9.32%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20%

11.71%

-10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.76%

12.76%

-11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

15.17%

-9.40%

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFR.TO has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFR.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HFR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFR.TO
Global X Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF		3.65%3.76%4.50%5.67%3.39%1.29%2.69%2.61%2.35%2.12%1.97%2.13%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HFR.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for HFR.TO.

HFR.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for HFR.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFR.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer