HFMF vs. BDRY
HFMF (Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Unlimited, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. HFMF is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. HFMF charges 0.97%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
HFMF vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFMF achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.
HFMF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -6.95%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 34.21%
- 6M
- 34.67%
- 1Y
- 103.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.09%
- 5Y*
- -16.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HFMF vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 2.96% | 6.34% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 34.21% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFMF and BDRY is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFMF vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
HFMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDRY
HFMF vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFMF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFMF vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFMF drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMF and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFMF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -89.16% | +75.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.84% | -71.65% | +57.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -58.43% | +55.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.65% | — |
Volatility
HFMF vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFMF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 42.10% | -25.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 60.24% | -43.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 62.40% | -46.01% |
HFMF vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFMF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFMF vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
HFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 2.88% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFMF and BDRY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HFMF is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HFMF is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
HFMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
HFMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HFMF and 3.76% for BDRY.
Find the right allocation for HFMF and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer