HFMDX vs. DNLDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HFMDX (Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HFMDX returned 14.88%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFMDX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.

Performance

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFMDX achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than DNLDX's 13.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HFMDX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 14.88%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.

HFMDX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 18.54%
• 6M: 16.28%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 24.20%
• 5Y*: 17.22%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

DNLDX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 13.68%
• 6M: 12.10%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFMDX Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund	18.54%	2.68%	34.13%	30.83%	2.72%	27.23%	23.37%	15.76%	-23.52%	20.71%
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.68%	9.79%	22.27%	16.99%	-14.34%	26.49%	9.29%	16.82%	-14.46%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMDX and DNLDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004	0.87

The correlation between HFMDX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFMDX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMDX

HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 27
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

DNLDX

DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 54
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.78	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.56	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.30	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	12.34	-5.09

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFMDX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMDX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, roughly equal to the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMDX and DNLDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.25%	-63.69%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.66%	-7.29%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.76%	-20.42%	-7.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.76%	-23.42%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.14%	-42.23%	-13.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	0.00%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.22%	-9.62%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	1.95%	+1.84%

Volatility

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 4.43%. This indicates that HFMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	4.43%	+2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	10.15%	+6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.06%	13.54%	+8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.42%	18.54%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.15%	19.55%	+5.60%

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFMDX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

HFMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DNLDX's 13.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.22%	14.15%	15.24%	1.69%	8.82%	17.74%	2.77%	2.65%	11.14%	11.32%	1.00%	3.12%
HFMDX Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund	0.61%	0.72%	18.84%	9.61%	21.66%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	40.95%	18.56%	0.64%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFMDX and DNLDX in my portfolio?

HFMDX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFMDX or DNLDX?

HFMDX has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to DNLDX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFMDX dropped -61.25% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.