PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFLGX vs. HFMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFLGX achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than HFMDX's 16.28% return. Over the past 10 years, HFLGX has underperformed HFMDX with an annualized return of 11.66%, while HFMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


HFLGX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.01%
YTD
8.75%
6M
7.17%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
11.66%

HFMDX

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.34%
YTD
16.28%
6M
16.34%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFLGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund
8.75%7.40%4.38%21.74%-13.23%34.89%5.49%27.53%-9.58%17.10%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
16.28%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HFLGX and HFMDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2009

0.82

The correlation between HFLGX and HFMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFLGX vs. HFMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFLGX
HFLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
HFLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HFLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFLGXHFMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.13

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

7.16

-1.18

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the HFMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFLGX and HFMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFLGXHFMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.26

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.69

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.44

+0.31

Drawdowns

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFLGX drawdown since its inception was -38.90%, smaller than the maximum HFMDX drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFLGX and HFMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFLGXHFMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.90%

-61.25%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-12.66%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-27.76%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-27.76%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.90%

-56.14%

+17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.44%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-12.25%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.75%

-1.08%

Volatility

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX) is 3.87%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that HFLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFLGXHFMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

6.22%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

15.82%

-7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

21.46%

-9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

23.35%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

25.09%

-6.22%

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFLGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HFMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFLGX vs. HFMDX - Dividend Comparison

HFLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than HFMDX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFLGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund
5.58%6.07%4.44%3.74%19.36%14.30%5.26%2.43%26.78%4.11%7.15%30.08%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.62%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFLGX and HFMDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFMDX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to HFLGX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFLGX dropped -38.90% vs HFMDX's -61.25%.

HFLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFLGX and HFMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer