HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO
HFG.TO (Hamilton Global Financials ETF) and HXF.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. HFG.TO is actively managed, while HXF.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HFG.TO returned 15.43%/yr vs 20.22%/yr for HXF.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFG.TO achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than HXF.TO's 26.34% return.
HFG.TO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- —
HXF.TO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 25.83%
- YTD
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 53.55%
- 3Y*
- 33.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 7.76% | 22.93% | 30.80% | 18.51% | -9.52% | 30.39% | 15.62% | 16.95% | -14.80% | 2.48% |
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 26.34% | 35.34% | 30.19% | 12.46% | -9.00% | 35.14% | 1.80% | 21.45% | -9.50% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFG.TO and HXF.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2017 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HFG.TO
HXF.TO
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFG.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.80 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 6.78 | -5.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 27.43 | -22.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFG.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, which is greater than HXF.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFG.TO and HXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFG.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -39.77% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.94% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -12.90% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.20% | -21.45% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.06% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.96% | +1.50% |
Volatility
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFG.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.58% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 11.62% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 13.23% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 14.79% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.03% | +3.23% |
Dividends
HFG.TO vs. HXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 3.05% | 3.86% | 10.09% | 4.16% | 1.85% |
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFG.TO and HXF.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Global X.
Find the right allocation for HFG.TO and HXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer