HFEAX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HFEAX (Janus Henderson European Focus Fund) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HFEAX returned 9.08%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for BIAHX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HFEAX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFEAX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than BIAHX's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HFEAX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.

HFEAX

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 1Y: 17.26%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: 9.08%
• ALL TIME*: 11.78%

BIAHX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: -0.58%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 1Y: 12.99%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: 12.27%
• ALL TIME*: 9.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HFEAX Janus Henderson European Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFEAX Janus Henderson European Focus Fund	4.12%	39.88%	2.11%	18.26%	-16.11%	18.83%	26.49%	31.42%	-27.83%	16.11%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	4.98%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HFEAX and BIAHX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.87

The correlation between HFEAX and BIAHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HFEAX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFEAX

HFEAX Risk / Return Rank: 25
HFEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HFEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HFEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HFEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HFEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 25
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFEAX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.92	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.42	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.17	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	0.99	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	2.60	+1.22

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFEAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFEAX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFEAX drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEAX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFEAX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.73%	-34.90%	-31.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.43%	-13.18%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.43%	-13.18%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.16%	-30.95%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.73%	-34.90%	-1.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-3.10%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.81%	-6.03%	-4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	5.00%	-0.87%

Volatility

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.07%. This indicates that HFEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFEAX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	4.07%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	12.14%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.02%	14.22%	+3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	16.40%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	16.89%	+1.53%

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFEAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFEAX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

HFEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BIAHX's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.24%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%
HFEAX Janus Henderson European Focus Fund	1.08%	1.12%	1.45%	2.18%	2.40%	0.13%	0.28%	0.98%	4.26%	1.70%	2.59%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFEAX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

HFEAX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFEAX or BIAHX?

HFEAX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to BIAHX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFEAX dropped -66.73% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.