HFAHX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HFAHX (Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, HFAHX returned 24.74% vs 39.07% for LIAGX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFAHX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y (HFAHX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAHX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.91% return.

HFAHX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIAGX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 26.91%
• 6M: 27.63%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HFAHX Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y	7.13%	43.12%	6.42%	7.14%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	26.91%	25.09%	9.43%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAHX and LIAGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.68

The correlation between HFAHX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFAHX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFAHX

HFAHX Risk / Return Rank: 38
HFAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
HFAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HFAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HFAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
HFAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 49
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y (HFAHX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFAHX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.92	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.64	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.72	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	10.93	-3.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAHX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFAHX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.92	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.44	+1.29

Drawdowns

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAHX drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAHX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFAHX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-37.87%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-14.56%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.68%	-1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-13.22%	+10.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	3.62%	-0.46%

Volatility

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y (HFAHX) is 4.37%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that HFAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFAHX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	8.20%	-3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	17.97%	-6.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	20.65%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.21%	18.78%	-4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.21%	18.78%	-4.57%

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAHX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFAHX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

HFAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HFAHX Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class Y	5.93%	6.35%	1.58%	0.29%	0.00%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFAHX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

HFAHX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFAHX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to HFAHX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAHX dropped -14.13% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.