PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFADX vs. JANIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFADX vs. JANIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFADX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than JANIX's 11.41% return.


HFADX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.63%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*

JANIX

1D
0.03%
1M
2.30%
YTD
11.41%
6M
11.11%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFADX vs. JANIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFADX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D
0.54%5.88%1.69%6.30%-16.54%-0.74%9.45%9.58%0.56%1.89%
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
11.41%9.66%10.40%14.68%-23.65%6.76%28.56%28.42%-5.15%12.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HFADX and JANIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.12

Over the past year, HFADX and JANIX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFADX vs. JANIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFADX
HFADX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JANIX
JANIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JANIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JANIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFADX vs. JANIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFADXJANIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.28

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.43

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

10.00

-1.02

HFADX vs. JANIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the JANIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFADX and JANIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFADXJANIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.67

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.22

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.49

-0.13

Drawdowns

HFADX vs. JANIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFADX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum JANIX drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFADX and JANIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFADXJANIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-62.76%

+41.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-11.05%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.53%

-23.89%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-31.80%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.57%

-1.01%

-4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-10.03%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

2.68%

-2.14%

Volatility

HFADX vs. JANIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) is 0.86%, while Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that HFADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFADXJANIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

5.24%

-4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

12.42%

-10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

16.07%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

19.61%

-13.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

20.59%

-15.61%

HFADX vs. JANIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFADX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than JANIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFADX vs. JANIX - Dividend Comparison

HFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than JANIX's 10.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFADX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D
3.84%3.75%2.94%2.40%8.93%1.47%4.47%3.62%5.05%1.55%0.00%0.00%
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
10.08%11.23%7.57%7.15%6.24%20.40%4.12%4.26%7.50%5.08%2.74%7.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFADX and JANIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANIX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to HFADX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFADX dropped -21.50% vs JANIX's -62.76%.

HFADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFADX and JANIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer