PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEWB.TO achieves a 19.10% return, which is significantly higher than ESGC.TO's 12.27% return.


HEWB.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.52%
YTD
19.10%
6M
24.68%
1Y
59.97%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
18.20%
10Y*

ESGC.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.89%
YTD
12.27%
6M
14.01%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HEWB.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF
19.10%43.48%24.54%11.00%-10.46%39.19%12.93%
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF
12.27%32.85%18.64%7.50%-7.28%23.99%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020

0.49

The correlation between HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEWB.TO
HEWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGC.TO
ESGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEWB.TOESGC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.55

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.72

3.45

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.62

15.05

+15.57

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEWB.TOESGC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

2.82

+1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.26

-0.35

Drawdowns

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, which is greater than ESGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEWB.TOESGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.43%

-16.66%

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-10.14%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.84%

-11.51%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.89%

-16.66%

-9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.35%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-3.61%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.32%

-0.36%

Volatility

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO) at 4.19%. This indicates that HEWB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEWB.TOESGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.19%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

10.53%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

12.40%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

12.67%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

12.73%

+6.56%

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEWB.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGC.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEWB.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEWB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF
2.13%2.34%2.60%3.23%2.98%2.28%0.67%
HEWB.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGC.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for HEWB.TO.

HEWB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ESGC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for HEWB.TO and 0.15% for ESGC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEWB.TO and ESGC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer