PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HESGX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon ESG Defensive Core Fund (HESGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HESGX achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 13.77% return.


HESGX

1D
1.53%
1M
3.25%
6M
10.92%
YTD
10.97%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.52%

FLCPX

1D
1.81%
1M
2.68%
6M
13.07%
YTD
13.77%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
15.39%
ALL TIME*
16.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HESGX
Horizon ESG Defensive Core Fund
10.97%9.56%22.41%23.52%-18.83%27.45%21.75%-0.24%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
13.77%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HESGX and FLCPX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between HESGX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HESGX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HESGX
HESGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon ESG Defensive Core Fund (HESGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HESGXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.69

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

11.52

-2.61

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HESGX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HESGX drawdown since its inception was -24.43%, smaller than the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HESGX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HESGXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.43%

-33.87%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.89%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-18.76%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

-24.40%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-4.15%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.07%

+0.26%

Volatility

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon ESG Defensive Core Fund (HESGX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that HESGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HESGXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.13%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

10.32%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

12.96%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

17.21%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

18.18%

-2.00%

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HESGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

HESGX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

HESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.03%, more than FLCPX's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.49%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%
HESGX
Horizon ESG Defensive Core Fund
15.03%16.68%0.29%0.61%0.52%2.51%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, HESGX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCPX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to HESGX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HESGX dropped -24.43% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HESGX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer