PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERU.L vs. CLO6.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) and Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HERU.L is traded in USD, while CLO6.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CLO6.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERU.L achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than CLO6.L's 10.58% return.


HERU.L

1D
-1.65%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
-14.21%
6M
-16.08%
1Y
-15.16%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
-4.95%
10Y*

CLO6.L

1D
1.84%
1M
12.80%
YTD
10.58%
6M
10.18%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HERU.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD
-14.21%24.71%18.11%6.15%-35.25%-3.72%
CLO6.L
Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF
10.58%-5.68%5.58%43.95%-40.95%-14.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HERU.L and CLO6.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between HERU.L and CLO6.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERU.L
HERU.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HERU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HERU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CLO6.L
CLO6.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) and Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HERU.LCLO6.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.08

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

0.30

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

0.72

-1.81

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERU.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERU.L and CLO6.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HERU.LCLO6.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

0.28

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

-0.16

-0.03

Drawdowns

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERU.L drawdown since its inception was -55.72%, roughly equal to the maximum CLO6.L drawdown of -53.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERU.L and CLO6.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERU.LCLO6.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.72%

-53.73%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.06%

-26.64%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-32.18%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.58%

-20.07%

-14.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-34.50%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.96%

11.09%

+2.87%

Volatility

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) is 5.76%, while Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that HERU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLO6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERU.LCLO6.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

11.61%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

24.72%

-9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.26%

28.34%

-9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

29.91%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

29.91%

-6.24%

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CLO6.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERU.L vs. CLO6.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HERU.L nor CLO6.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HERU.L and CLO6.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HERU.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HERU.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO6.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERU.L and 0.55% for CLO6.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERU.L and CLO6.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer