PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERG.L vs. RNRU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERG.L achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than RNRU.L's 19.04% return.


HERG.L

1D
-1.57%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-14.16%
6M
-16.63%
1Y
-14.51%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-4.07%
10Y*

RNRU.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.21%
1Y
49.83%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
-14.16%15.10%20.65%0.14%-27.54%-4.02%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
19.04%24.83%-21.90%-19.50%-0.25%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HERG.L and RNRU.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.42

The correlation between HERG.L and RNRU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERG.L
HERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HERG.LRNRU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.52

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

8.92

-9.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

29.05

-30.13

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERG.L and RNRU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HERG.LRNRU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

3.13

-3.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.12

-0.09

Drawdowns

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum RNRU.L drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERG.L and RNRU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERG.LRNRU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-53.53%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-5.56%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-37.25%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.54%

-20.48%

-12.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-29.04%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.35%

1.71%

+11.64%

Volatility

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) is 5.04%, while Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that HERG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNRU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERG.LRNRU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.73%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

11.94%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

15.86%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.13%

18.35%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

18.35%

+2.05%

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HERG.L and RNRU.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

HERG.L vs. RNRU.L - Dividend Comparison

HERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while RNRU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
0.97%0.24%0.37%0.00%0.01%0.07%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERG.L and RNRU.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HERG.L and RNRU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

HERG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while RNRU.L is Energy Equities. HERG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while RNRU.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERG.L and RNRU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer