HERG.L vs. LEGR.L
HERG.L (Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP) and LEGR.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Global X and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERG.L returned -4.07%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for LEGR.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEGR.L.
Performance
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HERG.L is traded in GBP, while LEGR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LEGR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERG.L achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR.L's 12.71% return.
HERG.L
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -14.16%
- 6M
- -16.63%
- 1Y
- -14.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 32.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERG.L Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP | -14.16% | 15.10% | 20.65% | 0.14% | -27.54% | -8.40% | -0.53% |
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 12.71% | 22.20% | 18.32% | 15.73% | -8.88% | 18.51% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERG.L and LEGR.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HERG.L and LEGR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERG.L
LEGR.L
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERG.L
LEGR.L
Technology
HERG.L
LEGR.L
Industrials
HERG.L
LEGR.L
Basic Materials
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Consumer Cyclical
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Consumer Defensive
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Energy
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Financial Services
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Healthcare
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Real Estate
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
-
Utilities
HERG.L
-
LEGR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L — Risk / Return Rank
HERG.L
LEGR.L
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERG.L | LEGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.43 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.21 | -4.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 14.27 | -15.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERG.L | LEGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 2.40 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.87 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.80 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than LEGR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERG.L and LEGR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERG.L | LEGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -26.80% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.96% | -7.63% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | -15.29% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.40% | -16.60% | -23.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.54% | -1.10% | -31.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -4.35% | -25.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 2.25% | +11.10% |
Volatility
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERG.L | LEGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.90% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.20% | 10.68% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 13.40% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 15.11% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 17.35% | +3.05% |
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERG.L vs. LEGR.L - Dividend Comparison
HERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while LEGR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERG.L Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP | 0.97% | 0.24% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% |
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERG.L and LEGR.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HERG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HERG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERG.L and 0.65% for LEGR.L.
Find the right allocation for HERG.L and LEGR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer