HEQQ vs. HOLA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HEQQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HEQQ returned 11.59% vs 17.66% for HOLA. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQQ achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than HOLA's 7.29% return.

HEQQ

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 1.17%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 1Y: 11.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.65%

HOLA

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 3.35%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	$19.72K	$10.59K	$92.03K
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	$762.47K	$628.26K	$1.14M

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.75%	8.80%
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	7.29%	7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQQ and HOLA is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.57

The correlation between HEQQ and HOLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEQQ	HOLA
Technology	59.6%	14.4%
Communication Services	12.9%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	6.6%
Healthcare	4.4%	9.8%
Industrials	3.0%	18.2%
Utilities	1.6%	4.3%
Basic Materials	0.7%	5.1%
Financial Services	0.6%	25.7%
Energy	0.6%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.9%

Return for Risk

HEQQ vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEQQ

HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 46
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HOLA

HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 73
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HEQQ	HOLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.71	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.50	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	2.48	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	8.40	-3.10

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the HOLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQQ and HOLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQQ drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQQ and HOLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEQQ	HOLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-6.99%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-6.99%	-0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-0.36%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-1.40%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.06%	0.00%

Volatility

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) at 3.65%. This indicates that HEQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEQQ	HOLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.65%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.37%	8.38%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.28%	10.13%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	10.15%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.99%	10.15%	+0.84%

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HEQQ and HOLA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

HEQQ vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

HEQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than HOLA's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.22%	0.19%
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.82%	3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEQQ and HOLA in my portfolio?

HEQQ and HOLA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEQQ or HOLA?

HEQQ has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to HOLA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQQ dropped -7.64% vs HOLA's -6.99%.

Which ETF is better, HEQQ or HOLA?

On 1-year performance, HOLA leads with 17.66% vs 11.59% for HEQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HOLA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEQQ or HOLA?

Over the 1-year period, HOLA has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEQQ or HOLA?

HEQQ and HOLA have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEQQ or HOLA?

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.22% for HEQQ.

What is the main difference between HEQQ and HOLA?

HEQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HOLA is Equity Hedged.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.