HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEQL.TO (Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD) and METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while METE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HEQL.TO returned 39.10% vs -5.95% for METE.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEQL.TO charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for METE.TO.

Performance

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQL.TO achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than METE.TO's -4.55% return.

HEQL.TO

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 8.44%
• YTD: 16.61%
• 6M: 16.02%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METE.TO

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -2.86%
• 1Y: -5.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD	16.61%	23.01%
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	-4.55%	-0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQL.TO and METE.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQL.TO

HEQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
HEQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HEQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HEQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HEQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
HEQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

METE.TO

METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEQL.TO	METE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	-0.16	+2.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	0.02	+3.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.00	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	-0.17	+4.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.83	-0.36	+17.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the METE.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQL.TO and METE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEQL.TO	METE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	-0.16	+2.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.08	-0.09	+2.17

Drawdowns

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, smaller than the maximum METE.TO drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQL.TO and METE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEQL.TO	METE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.86%	-40.10%	+20.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.69%	-35.48%	+24.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-22.07%	+21.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-15.68%	+13.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	16.51%	-14.05%

Volatility

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO) is 4.35%, while Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that HEQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEQL.TO	METE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	9.99%	-5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	28.26%	-16.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	36.57%	-20.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	42.08%	-23.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	42.08%	-23.72%

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQL.TO has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than METE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEQL.TO vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than METE.TO's 25.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD	1.62%	1.82%	1.75%	0.55%
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	25.77%	21.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEQL.TO and METE.TO in my portfolio?

HEQL.TO and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HEQL.TO or METE.TO?

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEQL.TO or METE.TO?

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for HEQL.TO.

What is the main difference between HEQL.TO and METE.TO?

HEQL.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while METE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for HEQL.TO and 0.40% for METE.TO.