HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO
HEQL.TO (Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Global X. HEQL.TO is actively managed, while CFOU.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, HEQL.TO returned 40.06% vs 92.42% for CFOU.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEQL.TO charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQL.TO achieves a 17.16% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 24.98% return.
HEQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- 17.16%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 92.42%
- 3Y*
- 57.98%
- 5Y*
- 28.78%
- 10Y*
- 23.08%
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD | 17.16% | 22.78% | 28.97% | 8.75% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 24.98% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQL.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HEQL.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HEQL.TO
CFOU.TO
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQL.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.78 | 3.77 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.78 | 4.53 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 5.79 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.37 | 23.74 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQL.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 3.77 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 0.34 | +1.77 |
Drawdowns
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQL.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQL.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -86.23% | +66.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.69% | -16.08% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.85% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -22.47% | +20.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 3.92% | -1.46% |
Volatility
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO) is 4.47%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that HEQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQL.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 8.37% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 21.00% | -9.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 24.64% | -8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 27.56% | -9.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 33.85% | -15.48% |
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQL.TO has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQL.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
HEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQL.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEQL.TO is cheaper at 1.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEQL.TO is cheaper with a 1.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Their fees differ too: 1.46% for HEQL.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for HEQL.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer