HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (HEP.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO).

HEP.TO and CPCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEP.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Gold Producers Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011. CPCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. Both HEP.TO and CPCC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (HEP.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEP.TO Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	-1.36%	3.63%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.71%	9.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEP.TO achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than CPCC.TO's 0.71% return.

HEP.TO

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -23.06%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 65.25%
• 3Y*: 37.98%
• 5Y*: 23.17%
• 10Y*: 16.29%

CPCC.TO

• 1D: 6.72%
• 1M: -17.90%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEP.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than CPCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

HEP.TO

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

CPCC.TO

Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEP.TO

HEP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
HEP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HEP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HEP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HEP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HEP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (HEP.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEP.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEP.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.84	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between HEP.TO and CPCC.TO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than CPCC.TO's 1.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEP.TO Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.94%	2.16%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.08%	9.20%	11.62%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.94%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HEP.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEP.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than CPCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEP.TO and CPCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEP.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.13%	-27.12%	-44.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.06%	-18.06%	-5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.60%	-5.88%	-28.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEP.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.26%	43.22%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.16%	43.22%	-12.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.74%	43.22%	-11.48%