HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L).
HEMC.L and XMMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEMC.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. XMMS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. Both HEMC.L and XMMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEMC.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.17% | 24.74% | 8.89% | 2.36% | -2.34% |
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 6.60% | 24.71% | 9.13% | 2.81% | -2.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
HEMC.L is traded in GBP, while XMMS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMMS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEMC.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than XMMS.L's 6.60% return.
HEMC.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMS.L
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEMC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
HEMC.L
XMMS.L
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEMC.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.84 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.38 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.85 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 9.99 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEMC.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.84 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.33 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEMC.L and XMMS.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HEMC.L nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEMC.L drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum XMMS.L drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEMC.L and XMMS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEMC.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -27.76% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -11.04% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -7.58% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -10.19% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.15% | -0.05% |
Volatility
HEMC.L vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) have volatilities of 7.02% and 7.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEMC.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 7.24% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 12.62% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 16.75% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 16.18% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 18.71% | -3.79% |