HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE).
HEMC.L and XDEM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEMC.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. XDEM.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. Both HEMC.L and XDEM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEMC.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.17% | 24.74% | 8.89% | 2.36% | -2.34% |
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.04% | 13.71% | 32.21% | 6.01% | 5.90% |
Different Trading Currencies
HEMC.L is traded in GBP, while XDEM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEM.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEMC.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than XDEM.DE's 0.04% return.
HEMC.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.DE
- 1D
- 4.79%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEMC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HEMC.L
XDEM.DE
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEMC.L | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.94 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.43 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.02 | +0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 7.46 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEMC.L | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.94 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.90 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEMC.L and XDEM.DE is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HEMC.L nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEMC.L drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.DE drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEMC.L and XDEM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEMC.L | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -30.93% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -13.49% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -4.76% | -2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -6.06% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.55% | +0.55% |
Volatility
HEMC.L vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) is 7.02%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that HEMC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEMC.L | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 7.71% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 13.01% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 19.17% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 16.83% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 17.77% | -2.85% |