PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELX vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HELX vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HELX vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
-8.96%26.34%-5.32%1.14%-37.89%9.80%85.05%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-5.04%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%27.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELX achieves a -8.96% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -5.04% return.


HELX

1D
4.58%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-8.96%
6M
7.21%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*

VHT

1D
2.24%
1M
-7.50%
YTD
-5.04%
6M
5.91%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HELX vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HELX vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELX
HELX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELX vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HELXVHTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.27

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.49

+0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.06

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

0.51

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.85

1.09

+2.76

HELX vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HELX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HELX and VHT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HELXVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.27

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.34

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.56

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between HELX and VHT is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HELX vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

HELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VHT's 1.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
0.43%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.73%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Drawdowns

HELX vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELX drawdown since its inception was -58.75%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELX and VHT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HELXVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.75%

-39.12%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.01%

-10.40%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.75%

-17.71%

-41.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.87%

-8.05%

-34.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.11%

-5.98%

-28.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

4.96%

+0.54%

Volatility

HELX vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 5.10%. This indicates that HELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HELXVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

5.10%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.44%

10.28%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.24%

17.61%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.26%

14.85%

+9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.47%

16.94%

+10.53%