HELX vs. SPAQ
HELX (Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HELX returned 7.14%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for SPAQ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HELX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAQ.
Performance
HELX vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 3.35% return.
HELX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- -5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELX vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HELX Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF | 0.89% | 26.34% | -5.32% | -5.24% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 3.35% | 7.35% | 4.33% | 5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELX and SPAQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2023 | 0.06 |
HELX vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HELX
SPAQ
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
HELX
SPAQ
-
Basic Materials
HELX
SPAQ
-
Technology
HELX
SPAQ
-
Communication Services
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Defensive
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Energy
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Financial Services
HELX
-
SPAQ
Industrials
HELX
-
SPAQ
Real Estate
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Utilities
HELX
-
SPAQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELX vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
HELX
SPAQ
HELX vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HELX | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.82 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 2.97 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HELX vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELX drawdown since its inception was -58.75%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELX and SPAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELX | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.75% | -5.30% | -53.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.01% | -5.00% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -5.30% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -0.32% | -36.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -0.53% | -33.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.09% | 1.39% | +5.70% |
Volatility
HELX vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.02%. This indicates that HELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELX | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 1.02% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 5.06% | +11.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.37% | 8.65% | +12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 6.96% | +17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 6.96% | +20.40% |
HELX vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELX vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
HELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SPAQ's 16.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELX Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.12% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.15% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HELX and SPAQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HELX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SPAQ (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELX dropped -58.75% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.
On 3-year performance, HELX leads with 7.14% vs 5.98% for SPAQ. On fees, HELX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HELX has performed better with a 7.14% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HELX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.15%, compared with 0.39% for HELX.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELX and 0.85% for SPAQ.
HELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HELX and SPAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer