PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELO vs. OCTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HELO vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HELO vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
-3.37%7.82%18.05%6.30%
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
-0.95%9.68%8.67%5.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a -3.37% return, which is significantly lower than OCTW's -0.95% return.


HELO

1D
0.33%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTW

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
0.51%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HELO vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HELO vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELO vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HELOOCTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.22

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.80

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.70

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

9.08

-3.42

HELO vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HELO Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HELO and OCTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HELOOCTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.22

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between HELO and OCTW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HELO vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while OCTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.66%0.67%0.60%0.19%
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HELO vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and OCTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HELOOCTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-8.38%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-5.86%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-1.93%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.84%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.10%

+0.34%

Volatility

HELO vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 2.45%. This indicates that HELO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HELOOCTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.45%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.39%

4.09%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

8.04%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

6.25%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

6.19%

+1.94%