PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELO vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HELO vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.76% return.


HELO

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
1.25%
6M
0.39%
1Y
7.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HELO vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
1.25%7.82%18.05%5.25%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.76%4.37%5.16%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HELO and BOXX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HELO vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELO vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HELOBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-33.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

8.74

-7.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

58.31

-56.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

497.70

-491.43

HELO vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HELO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HELO and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HELO vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HELOBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-0.12%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-0.07%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-0.00%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.01%

+1.31%

Volatility

HELO vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.10%. This indicates that HELO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HELOBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

0.10%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.99%

0.26%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

0.32%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

0.37%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

0.37%

+7.59%

HELO vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HELO vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.64%0.67%0.60%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


HELO and BOXX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HELO has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to BOXX (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELO dropped -10.89% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 7.96% vs 3.98% for BOXX. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 7.96% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

HELO is categorized as Options Trading, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELO and 0.19% for BOXX.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.44 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HELO and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer