HEGD vs. PHDG
Compare and contrast key facts about Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG).
HEGD and PHDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEGD is a passively managed fund by Swan that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020. PHDG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. Both HEGD and PHDG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HEGD vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEGD vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | -1.73% | 12.95% | 15.24% | 14.16% | -11.25% | 17.30% | 0.99% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.69% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 1.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 1.69% return.
HEGD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEGD vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HEGD vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank
HEGD
PHDG
HEGD vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEGD | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 0.60 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 0.83 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.12 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 0.69 | +2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 1.93 | +9.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEGD | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 0.60 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.36 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.46 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEGD and PHDG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HEGD vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison
HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than PHDG's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 2.08% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Drawdowns
HEGD vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and PHDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEGD | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -17.70% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -8.93% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | -17.06% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -1.82% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -6.32% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 3.24% | -2.10% |
Volatility
HEGD vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) is 2.21%, while Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that HEGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEGD | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 2.79% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.93% | 6.33% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 10.58% | -2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.41% | 10.90% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.40% | 11.89% | -2.49% |