PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEGD vs. MAXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than MAXJ's 2.84% return.


HEGD

1D
0.30%
1M
3.81%
YTD
7.52%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

MAXJ

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
7.52%12.95%5.91%
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
2.84%8.97%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HEGD and MAXJ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.75

The correlation between HEGD and MAXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEGD vs. MAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEGD
HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEGDMAXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

3.30

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

5.45

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.79

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

5.80

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.84

32.89

-15.05

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the MAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEGD and MAXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEGDMAXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

3.30

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.64

-0.56

Drawdowns

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than MAXJ's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and MAXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEGDMAXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-6.35%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-1.70%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-0.56%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.30%

+0.80%

Volatility

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Volatility Comparison

Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) at 0.33%. This indicates that HEGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEGDMAXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

0.33%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

1.93%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.92%

2.93%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

5.29%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.35%

5.29%

+4.06%

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MAXJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEGD vs. MAXJ - Dividend Comparison

HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MAXJ's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
0.33%0.36%0.43%0.39%0.87%0.31%
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.98%1.01%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEGD and MAXJ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEGD has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to MAXJ (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEGD dropped -14.56% vs MAXJ's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, HEGD leads with 19.36% vs 9.63% for MAXJ. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 19.36% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.

MAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.33% for HEGD.

They also come from different issuers: Swan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.50% for MAXJ.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEGD and MAXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer